We attentively monitor the presses for interesting pieces on oysters and oyster population management and then read them voraciously. Time constraints have prevented many of them from reaching this blog as they wind up on our Facebook page.
The article below is excerpted from a piece published on TCPalm by Treasure Coast Newspapers. We liked it as it discusses how oysters handle an environmental assault and how engineers are working to manage the assault from Lake Okeechobee to protect the oyster population downstream in Stuart Florida.
Florida's Lake Okeechobee |
STUART —
Vincent Encomio expected the worst last week as he waded out to oyster beds in
the St. Lucie River.
After all, the
2013 Lake Okeechobee discharges, which dumped 136.1 billion gallons of polluted
water into the river over 166 days, wiped out the oysters along Stuart's
Riverwalk. And this year's discharges stretched over 279 days and totaled 220
billion gallons.
Encomio,
director of scientific research at the Florida Oceanographic Society in Stuart,
figured the oysters that had repopulated the beds since 2013 didn't stand a
chance.
"It was
amazing," Encomio said. "I picked up a cluster of shells and found
live oysters; quite a few of them in fact."
Based on what
he saw, Encomio estimated at least half the oysters along Stuart's waterfront
survived the onslaught from Lake O.
Oysters
naturally thrive in the St. Lucie's somewhat-salty water. But extended
discharges that wipe out the river's salinity can wipe out the oysters, too.
The rule of thumb is that oysters can survive about a month of salt-free
water. Making matters worse, the sediment carried by the discharged water — about
54.7 million pounds of it from Lake O this year — clogs the filters oysters use
to feed.
Oysters can
close up to keep the sediment out and then starve to death.So why did oysters
fare so well in this year's onslaught?
Two reasons
During much of
this year's discharges, the Army Corps of Engineers released Lake O water in
"pulses" designed to mimic the
natural flow of water through the river after heavy rains. The flow rate is
high during the first part of the week and dwindles to two days of no
discharges at all.
Over the
279-day span of this year's discharges, there were 24 no-flow days.
"Those
stoppages, even though they were just a couple of days each time, really
helped," Encomio said. "They might have been enough to keep oysters
alive."
The breaks
allowed incoming tides to wash oyster beds in the downtown Stuart area of the
river with salty water, much like the oysters got closer to the inlet.
Also, although
2016's discharges lasted longer, 2013's were more intense.
"In 2013,
the discharge rate was really high," Encomio said. "They shot up in
mid-July and stayed high until September."
The high flows
coming down the river in 2013 kept tides from coming up the river; lower flow
rates in 2016 allowed some salt water to reach upstream.
Freshwater is
lighter than saltwater, and the light freshwater flowed downstream on top of
heavier saltwater, which pushed upstream on the bottom of the river — down
where the oysters are.
Encomio's
findings could lead scientists to encourage the corps to use pulse releases and
lower flow rates in future discharges.
"Our
stance is still that there should be no discharges at all, that excess Lake O
water needs to go south," Encomio said. "But if there are going to be
discharges, there's room for making sure they do the least amount of
environmental damage."
Fascinating read on oyster management in Florida! The article sheds light on how engineers are working to protect Stuart's oyster population from environmental assaults stemming from Lake Okeechobee discharges.
ReplyDeleteNew Jersey Reckless Driving