Mussels How They Hold On and Adhere So Well.

We frequently see mussels in with our oysters, and are often asked how the two species relate. The literature states that mussels like more current than oysters and that oysters have an affinity for brackish water (where there is less salt from fresh water entering the sea.) Nonetheless we frequently see them together with the mussels clinging tenaciously to our oysters. 

At times in Boston Harbor, we have been a amazed at how quickly they can overwhelm a milk crate or cage container.  Mysteriously, they will cover one container, but leave another 30 feet away untouched. This article from the MIT news discusses how the oysters are able to hold on so well.

For the record, we still like mussels as they are filter feeders as well and help clean the water. We also like them steamed in a garlic, butter and white wine sauce!

Just hanging on: Why mussels are so good at it

Understanding the strength of the shellfish’s underwater attachments could enable better glues and biomedical interfaces.

Mussels cling together with threads. Oysters cement themselves to one another.

 

 

The Byssus Threads have both stiff and elastic properties to resist considerable wave action.

Unlike barnacles, which cement themselves tightly to the surfaces of rocks, piers or ships, the clamlike bivalves called mussels dangle more loosely from these surfaces, attached by a collection of fine filaments known as byssus threads. This approach lets the creatures drift further out into the water, where they can absorb nutrients — although in the process, it exposes them to the risk of being torn away by the force of crashing waves.

But that almost never happens.

Despite the outwardly thin and fragile appearance of these threads, it turns out that in the dynamic, sloshing environment of waves and currents they can withstand impact forces that are nine times greater than the forces exerted by stretching in only one direction.




The secret to these tiny natural bungee cords has now been unraveled by MIT research scientist Zhao Qin and professor of civil and environmental engineering Markus Buehler. Their findings appear this week in the journal Nature Communications.

Byssus threads, they found, are composed of a well-designed combination of soft, stretchy material on one end and much stiffer material on the other. Both materials, despite their different mechanical properties, are made of a protein closely related to collagen, a main constituent of skin, bone, cartilage and tendons.

The team combined computer modeling and laboratory tests on the threads. To carry out their experiments, they placed an underwater cage in Boston Harbor for three weeks, during which time mussels attached themselves to the surfaces of glass, ceramics, wood and clay in the cage. Back in the lab, the mussels, threads and substrates were mounted in a tensile machine designed to test their strength by pulling on them with controlled deformation and recording the applied force during deformation.

“Many researchers have studied mussel glue before,” Qin says, referring to the sticky substance that anchors byssus threads to a surface. But the static strength of the glue, and of the thread itself, “is not sufficient to withstand the impact by waves,” he says. It’s only by measuring the system’s performance in simulated wave conditions that he and Buehler could determine how it accomplishes its amazing tenacity.

“We figured there must be something else going on,” says Buehler, who heads MIT’s Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering. “The adhesive is strong, but it’s not sufficient.”

The distribution of stiffness along the threads is key, Qin and Buehler found, suggesting that the distribution of intrinsic material properties and the overall architecture of the mussel attachment are important.

The distribution of stiffness in the mussels’ threads enables them to be subjected to very large impact forces from waves. About 80 percent of the length of the byssus threads is made of stiff material, while 20 percent is softer and stretchier. This precise ratio may be critical, the researchers found: The soft and stretchy portions of the threads attach to the mussel itself, while the stiffer portion attaches to the rock. “It turns out that the … 20 percent of softer, more extensible material is critical for mussel adhesion,” Qin says.

In their simulations, Qin and Buehler systematically tested other ratios of the material composition and found that the 80-20 ratio of stiff to soft leads to the smallest reaction force. Having more of the softer material increases the reaction force because the material cannot effectively slow down deformation. Moreover, having more stiff material in byssus threads has other advantages, as it prevents the mussels from being pulled too far out by waves, which “would make it easier to hit other objects” and be damaged, Qin says.

These findings, Qin and Buehler say, could help in the design of synthetic materials that share some of these properties. For example, surgical sutures used in blood vessels or intestines are subjected to pulsating or irregular flows of liquid; the use of materials that combine stiffness and stretchiness, as byssus threads do, might provide advantages. The researchers say there may also be applications for materials to attach instruments to buildings, or sensors to underwater vehicles or sensing equipment in extreme conditions.

Guy Genin, a professor of mechanical engineering and materials science at Washington University in St. Louis who was not connected with this research, calls this “a stunning result.” He adds, “Like the rest of the field, I certainly never suspected an architectural feature of the byssi themselves to be so central to the dynamic resilience of these organisms … the magic of this organism lies in the structurally clever integration of this compliant region with the stiff region.”

Genin adds that this work “will open up important new lines of inquiry across the many fields hinging upon effective attachment of dissimilar materials — for example, the attachment of tendon to bone.”

The work was supported by the Office of Naval Research and the National Science Foundation.