This is an excerpt from an article on Maryland legislative wrangling around oyster restoration and reserve areas. The original article can be found here Annapolis Star Democrat Article.
This highlights a similar challenge we have here in Massachusetts in that the regulatory authorities view oysters through a narrow lens- the DMF perceives them solely as a food product and ignore the environmental value they offer. The Mass DMF does a great job at regulating them from a food product perspective- vibrio cases per million oysters harvested are down. But, they refuse to embrace the environmental benefits as illustrated by a very disappointing presentation at a recent Massachusetts shellfish meeting. (We are seeking to obtain a copy.) Please read-on.
Article Excerpt-
Goldsborough said it sets up a dialogue between
all stakeholders, rather than dictate a structure that would convey
authority to one stakeholder group to manage a public resource,
“including the ability to open the protective sanctuaries that make up
25 percent of productive bars now, anyway.”
David Sikorski, who was at the bill hearing
Tuesday representing the Coastal Conservation Association, said oyster
management in Maryland has long been based on what can be harvested,
rather than looking at it from the ecological role of oysters in the
Bay’s ecosystem.
“We value our success on the level of harvest,
the economic benefit of that harvest, all too often and we forget about
that ecological role, and an ecological role is important because this
is a public resource,” Sikorski said. “It’s a public resource that’s not
just valuable to those that harvest it for a profit, it’s important to
the rest of the Bay’s citizens and the aquatic organisms which live
within these reef structures and oysters.”
Charles “Chip” MacLeod, spokesman for the Clean
Chesapeake Coalition, who also testified on the bill Tuesday, said that
simply from a water quality improvement point of view, “oyster
restoration could be a meaningful aspect of Maryland’s effort to really
improve the Chesapeake Bay.”
MacLeod said that the Environmental Protection
Agency estimates that a tenfold increase in the oyster population in the
Bay will remove 10 million pounds of nitrogen each year, and that
Maryland’s statewide goals under the Bay Total Maximum Daily Load is
11.8 million pounds per year.
“Now, our (Watershed Implementation Plan) has a
$14 billion price tag to pull out 11.8 million tons of nitrogen a year.
Oysters, if we got a tenfold increase, would do 10 million (pounds of
nitrogen) at no cost to the taxpayers, because the work is done by
commercial watermen regulated by the Department of Natural Resources,”
MacLeod said.
No comments:
Post a Comment